Comments on: The Hubble Space Telescope vs. New James Webb Space Telescope http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/ Stay Curious. Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:04:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: New Space Telescope at Deep Space Telescopes http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5401 Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:17:00 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5401 [...] Mouse here for Related LinksThe Hubble Space Telescope vs. New James Webb Space Telescope [...]

]]> By: weldon Kirui http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5296 Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:02:27 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5296 Im anxiously waiting for the launch of JWT in June 2014. the project is amazing. i am sure with JWT we will soon realise that we are not alone in the universe. there is life out there in those distant galaxies. Ever heard of Big Bag, big crunch and Big bounce. There was big bag,when the universe exploded creating the stars we see,in the big crunch, all the galaxies will collide and life destroyed. After this there will be creation all over again. Kudos to all scientists working on JWT.i am told that the tiny distant star that glows like firefly when see with naked eye will be magnified by JWT some 10 billion times!!!!

]]> By: Atul http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5283 Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:24:15 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-5283 This is really exciting but i guess we are not going to see start of galaxy but we are going to face some new questions? which we never thought

But this is some thing we will find out in 2014 till the time lets wait

]]> By: bob http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-4004 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:59:51 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-4004 hi this is BIG BOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i like the idea of a new space telescope but i do like hubble

]]> By: garywilson http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3947 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:58:00 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3947 Humankind can think and create such wonders, and understand and conceive of such wonders. Will we ever get past the horrors and cruelty we inflict on each other?

]]> By: yahye http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3946 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:15:09 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3946 thats realy cool

]]> By: John B http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3901 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:50:15 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3901 Just a couple of intriguing points:
1. If HST can see back to 13 billion years ago, why is JWST so much
larger – looking back beyond ‘The Big Bang’ perhaps ?
2. At the L2 location it will be impossible to manually service this item – as every eventuality should be catered for, such as a mishap when
being deployed, has a robotic ‘repairman’ been devised ?

]]> By: gene k. norman http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3797 Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:30:52 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3797 For all the knowledge of man common sence is nowhere, all the rocks, particles of dust,comets, planets with there moons, stars, black holes, galaxies in all the vastnest of space you can believe everything was once smaller than an atom. There is another answer, believable with common sence, making sence, logical, the creation of this universe as like all others is remarkable,but has happened before, will happen again and is explainable. We are to believe (even though light cannot escape a black hole beacuse of to much mass) everything was smaller than an atom, be for real, just how much can be compressed before you say hey that doesn,t seem right. How smart are we to look so stupid.

]]> By: guitargazer http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3483 Sat, 05 Sep 2009 05:08:36 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3483 Why does it have to be named James Webb? Nothing against the guy, it’s just that he is not very known, etc. Newton.

]]> By: haakon http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3017 Tue, 12 May 2009 04:40:27 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-3017 hi there man

]]> By: spacehelper http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2834 Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:34:31 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2834 I know this will help to our experts to know all space details and they may know the past of the galaxies and out universe

]]> By: spacedragon http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2825 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:37:02 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2825 on another subject has anyone heard anything new about the next generation shuttles or are they just gonna stick to the revamped appollo cans?

]]> By: spacedragon http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2824 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:34:46 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2824 i am rapt with the james webb space telescope. i have a deep interest in space and space technology, i am not a highly educated person but this is my passion and hobby. my family has no interest in space so i dont get to share with other likeminded people often. it is truly amazing what mankind can do these days and i feel i was born in the wrong era lol. 200 or even 1000 years from now would have done me fine but oh well lol. imagine what advancements we could have acheived in space if the human race was not so hell bent on killing each other. we could be light years ahead by now. imagine all the money invested in war instead invested in space wow. anyweay love the james webb and cant wait for the next era of secrets unraveled.

]]> By: BaTyA http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2743 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:07:07 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2743 На таких громких заголовках и подобной шумихе можно делать и не такие успехи :)

]]> By: catcherinthesky http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2610 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:31:25 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2610 I wish Carl Sagan would have been able to see it…. The Hubble was an amazingly successful project. We can only imagine the Webb’s impact on the knowledge of the human race. I wish everyone involved the very best of luck!

]]> By: kyleisthebest http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2525 Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:07:54 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2525 not gonna work

]]> By: xp95 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2523 Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:20:09 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2523 wow with the teliscope going up we might be able to find new life out there. now that would be the day :)

]]> By: Phillip Coffman http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2430 Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:42:34 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2430 With regard to Arno’s comment of May 20, 2007: Arno, ever hear of Perkin Elmer?? Ball Bros. had as much to do with the HST Optical Telescope Assy (OTA) as Perkin Elmer had to do with the Webb Telescope Assy. Namely; none! Ball did produce the temporary fix for the HST Optics problem known as the COSTAR. A trivial effort compared to the OTA.

]]> By: Bahtir Deliu http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2325 Mon, 26 May 2008 21:34:55 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2325 Very good, i love it, i wish i could c it for real.

]]> By: James C. Webb http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2199 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:25:43 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-2199 Very cool …
I am James C. Webb (not the)
And I approve this telescope.
Do you say ‘GodSpeed’ for an unmanned space object?

]]> By: EYE CATCHY PICS http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-754 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:12:12 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-754 Looking well! thanx for sharing!

]]> By: Aquil Akhter http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-479 Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-479 its all are very interesting……

]]> By: felixwas http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-85 Sat, 26 May 2007 22:26:43 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-85 What about the possibility of the mirror surfaces being degraded by impacts from micrometeorites, etc.?

]]> By: Kristine http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-72 Wed, 23 May 2007 15:24:20 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-72 Sometimes one must just sit… imagine what one cannot see.
A future awaits. Where? How? Who really knows?
I think of the writers…dreamers all.

http://ninepointview.wordpress.com/2006/11/09/hubble-telescope/

]]> By: yohanan1986 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-71 Wed, 23 May 2007 14:26:00 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-71 LOOKS GOOD.

]]> By: gaussling http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-68 Wed, 23 May 2007 02:20:25 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-68 It would be interesting to know just how close one has to be to L2 to get the benefit of L2. That is, how accurate does station keeping have to be at this position?

]]> By: A diversion into space telescopes « Lightwater http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-67 Tue, 22 May 2007 09:56:22 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-67 [...] occasionally wont to be diverted, see HERE, and THIS blog post falls into this [...]

]]> By: links for 2007-05-22 « Hic Sunt Dracones http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-66 Tue, 22 May 2007 07:22:51 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-66 [...] The Hubble Space Telescope vs. New James Webb Space Telescope « Michael Graham Richard At 13 billion years away, Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) contains an estimated 10,000 galaxies. With 5.8 times more mirror surface area than Hubble, James Webb telescope will be able to observe on frequencies that Hubble can’t. (tags: astronomy telescope hubble jameswebb comparison technology galaxy space universe) [...]

]]> By: Treavor http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-65 Tue, 22 May 2007 03:15:06 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-65 Amazing. With all those galaxy’s out there, surely there’s life besides that which exists on earth.

]]> By: Kaida Rose http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-63 Tue, 22 May 2007 00:55:50 +0000 http://michaelgr.com/2007/05/20/the-hubble-space-telescope-vs-new-james-webb-space-telescope/#comment-63 What’s the difference between a solar system and a gallaxy? Nice pictures of a solar system.

]]>